Saturday, August 13, 2005

No justice

We have moved but the saga continues. The evil hand of Gillian G. reaches out. Sounds like an into to a movie, a B movie that is.
There has to be other people who like us have come under the stupidity of the law. When it was said that the law was an ass, they were no joking!
Tom had been to court again a couple of weeks back on an assult charge, guess who brought the charges! Yeah who else and of course one Jason Meek. Tom kicked him up the arse and an independent witness saw it. Would you believe the prosecution were going to use him then realized his account actually supported Tom's account. Gillian and Meek, the 20 year old who pretends to the police that his is 17 therefore a minor and can get Tom into more trouble that way, is the boyfriend of Gillians 14year old daughter. She does not seem to think there is anything wrong in her daughter having sex with the guy. The police do not care either. Hope she gets pregnant. Anyway back to the point:-
Tom had no real recourse but to agree to the guilty plea for kicking the little B up the bum and senticing was put of till a social inquiry report was done. For a moment there we thourght here was someone who would listen and maybe...maybe help! Who were we kidding...only ourselves.
On reading the acount...who was he talking to? Because this dope better discription went through my head but they were to rude Mr. G.Beattie, Social Worker. I wonder did he dislike Tom, read something in the files to Tom's deprement, not believe him, not listen or just plain wanted to support the prosecution. (I have witnessed this being done in the Family Court in Australia, but rather than the prosecution it was for the mother..who else.)
In one part he reffered to Tom as Hetherington, who has never ever been know by that name. Claimed we had a disposable income available of £80, after taken things out of my benefit. Yeah I know one of them. Except my B.T., Aol etc were not taken into account nor was the dog food. Nor bus and train fares getting to the courts and solicitors. But that is being a little petty.
It was calimed that Tom had been in prison and he never has.
That he had infrequant contact with his brother...who had been living with us since December last year and for a year pryor to that would visit very second week and stay a few days and pryor to him doing that he had lived with us for two years. (I had even made comments on my blogs how I wished he would move out.)
Etc..Etc..
The matter was defered again for a medical report, somehow my illness have been transfered to Tom. LOLO!
It gets even better Tom and his solicitor had a disagreement seems the bar****d thought Tom guilty of something else totaly different matter from the past and Tom sacked him.
To my shock and horror two days later Thursday 11th Aug a report appears in the local paper intitled:-
"Sentence deferred on village assault." it goes on to say that Tom and he is mentioned by name and address battered a 17 year old seizing him by the neck, kicking him on the head and body. That his solicitor had dramatically withdrawn from the case. etc etc.....
Well, on phoneing the paper and speacking to the so-called reporter, she cclaimed she got the information from the court, refused to listen to Tom's version and said no one would lie about their age to the police and basically brushed Tom off. He was so angry.
How on earth can this keep happening??? When will it stop? When will someone who can help listen?
Janson Meek is not a 17 year old boy he is on the electoral roll and has been for two years. I remember his 18th birthday has he forgotten? At that time he and a friend worked on a car that Tom and I had. Oh yeah Meek is an old aquantence.
Well I guess that we are lucky in some ways. Remember poor Timothy Evans? Well he was hung for the murder of his wife and young daughter, neither of which he commited and the govenment gave him a pardon - postumously of course. Dr. Crippen was the real murderer. At least ours is not that bad but it feels it at times as all is relative.
Well that is my bitch for the time being I now have a few letters to write.
One other thing I hate the thourght of my money and I consider my benefit my money, going on paying fines that should never had been imposed in the first place..why should I pay Tom's fine? Those that be do not look at it the same way. Dammn Dammn Dammn

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home